Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190708
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJul 29 '22 at 02:50
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 80.6
1-Core 140
2-Core 280
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 854
81% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,298
80% 1,298 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$266
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.2% Very good
Lighting 90.9
Reflection 104
Parallax 137
74% 111 fps
MRender 84.9
Gravity 102
Splatting 69.4
69% 85.6 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN500 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 201000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 239 235 224 213 226 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 879
Write 271
Mixed 414
SusWrite 236
99% 450 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 48.3
170% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 868
DQ Write 519
DQ Mixed 576
461% 655 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 133%
Great: 228%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 425 422 413 401 411 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 423
Mixed 397
SusWrite 417
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 46.2
154% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 205
154% 207 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 101%
Great: 128%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
426GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 100 107 105 98 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 48.6
Write 95.1
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 104
56% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3200 C16 Series 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 33.4
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 29.3
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $880
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback