Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20JFCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 93% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 20JFCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20JFCTO1WW
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190508
Uptime34.8 Days
Run DateJul 29 '22 at 22:25
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 90%
CPU Throttled 93%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 63.1
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 165
55% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 283
33% 254 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 224E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.16% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 6.7
5% 5.77 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.4
5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.16%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$108
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 131P Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 390 186 286 187 267 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 470
Write 407
Mixed 482
SusWrite 277
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 38.9
84% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 423
DQ Write 483
DQ Mixed 403
317% 436 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 140%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304EB-EGCF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 16.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20JFCTO1WW Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20JFCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback