Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X9DRD-iF/LF  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRD-iF
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 12:28
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 188
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 694
61% 520 Pts
64-Core 1755
109% 1755 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.37 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.3
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 122 134 160 134 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 314
Write 364
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 140
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 9.5
59% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 34.1
65% 130 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 70%
Verbatim STORE N GO 4GB
3GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 4.4 4.1 3.8 3.6 4.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 3.9
7% 6.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
MC Read 58
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 29.9
116% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DRD-iF/LF Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback