Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201202
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 15:52
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 683
71% 572 Pts
64-Core 912
56% 912 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
4.01% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 1.9
4% 4 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.01%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$70
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1230 381 384 385 378 396 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 2,409
Write 2,216
Mixed 1,490
SusWrite 526
370% 1,660 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 73.5
242% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 867
DQ Write 550
DQ Mixed 794
569% 737 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 235%
Great: 302%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
295GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 99 100 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 88
Write 88
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 98.7
56% 77 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
357GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 137 137 136 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 143
Write 8.5
Mixed 66
SusWrite 136
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 36.7
MC Mixed 34.8
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 29.2
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,623 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 133% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback