Acer Aspire TC-120

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-120  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-120
Memory6.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140624
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateOct 18 '17 at 07:09
Run Duration627 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 135
59% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 220
30% 221 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Acer(1025 0904) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.23% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 8.35
Parallax 7.41
6% 7.88 fps
MRender 5.29
Gravity 6.63
Splatting 8.7
6% 6.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.23%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
602GB free
Firmware: 9401
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 97.9
Write 89
Mixed 88
20% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 9.07
4K Mixed 0.36
7% 3.46 MB/s
DQ Read 2.9
DQ Write 9.9
DQ Mixed 0.39
2% 4.39 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 18%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
487GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 161
Write 124
Mixed 96.7
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.19
78% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.5% Poor
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.1
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-120 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback