Lenovo 82MD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82MD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211227
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 15:20
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 260
91% 165 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 502
60% 461 Pts
64-Core 526
33% 526 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3F9C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1692
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 22.7
Parallax 28.9
18% 24.7 fps
MRender 18.9
Gravity 30.1
Splatting 0.2
12% 16.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SSSTC CL1-4D256 256GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BS262 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 227 381 221 213 236 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 688
Write 317
Mixed 310
SusWrite 259
87% 393 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 16.2
51% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 575
DQ Write 377
DQ Mixed 259
252% 404 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 156%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AL1P32NC4U1-B8BS Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.5% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 10.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 10.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82MD Builds (Compare 251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82MD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback