Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive361% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210622
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 12:09
Run Duration405 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$358
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 181
2-Core 358
112% 210 Pts
4-Core 690
8-Core 1,351
121% 1,021 Pts
64-Core 2,862
177% 2,862 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.7% Above average
Lighting 72.2
Reflection 80.5
Parallax 72.1
59% 74.9 fps
MRender 69.4
Gravity 72.8
Splatting 71.4
58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
826GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2820 2862 2079 2149 2017 1833 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
361% Outstanding
Read 3,166
Write 3,039
Mixed 2,826
SusWrite 2,293
637% 2,831 MB/s
4K Read 74.1
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 58.4
215% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,220
DQ Write 82.7
DQ Mixed 162
241% 488 MB/s
Poor: 264%
This bench: 361%
Great: 573%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
724GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1405 1404 1377 1332 1419 1363 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,582
Write 1,539
Mixed 1,587
SusWrite 1,383
395% 1,773 MB/s
4K Read 69
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 43.4
185% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 1,114
DQ Write 82
DQ Mixed 113
205% 436 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 270%
Great: 410%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$185
623GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 401 395 389 417 402 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 427
Mixed 428
SusWrite 401
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 40.1
133% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 68.3
DQ Mixed 174
121% 155 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 136%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
869GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 257 251 247 261 251 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 374
Write 356
Mixed 326
SusWrite 255
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 33.4
105% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 71.9
DQ Mixed 168
122% 163 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 121%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
406GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 91 91 97 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 79.9
Write 104
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 92.5
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
181% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 71%
SABRENT 1TB
760GB free
Firmware: RKT303.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1600 1516 902 845 892 818 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 100% Great: 100%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$66
619GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 143 153 138 153 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 143
Write 116
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 145
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
364% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 61.8
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 40.4
133% 46.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 37.5
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,866 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $869
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback