HP Compaq Presario CQ60 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Compaq Presario CQ60 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3612
Memory2.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '17 at 15:32
Run Duration346 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual T3200
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 70
1-Core 23
2-Core 45.2
34% 46.1 Pts
4-Core 44.2
8-Core 44.4
6% 44.3 Pts
64-Core 43.4
3% 43.4 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
HP(103C 360B) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2869
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.41% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.38
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.46 fps
MRender 0.38
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 0.57
0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.41%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS54501 160GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C64G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 53.9
Write 55.3
Mixed 52
40% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.83
4K Mixed 0.29
66% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 31%
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
3.87% Terrible
Read 15.8
Write 4.25
Mixed 5.28
9% 8.45 MB/s
4K Read 2.73
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.004
10% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.87%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.6% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 3
9% 3.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Presario CQ60 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Presario CQ60 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback