Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E5-474G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.29% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-474G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer ROBIN_SL
Memory9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '22 at 20:20
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 149
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 223
29% 217 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 0975) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.29% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 6.8
5% 5.8 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.7
6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.29%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AGI960G18AI238 960GB
823GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 311 352 331 356 357 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 406
Write 319
Mixed 304
SusWrite 336
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 20.9
89% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 32.9
76% 151 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73%
Great: 106%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
832GB free
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 109 110 108 110 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 93.2
Write 104
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 109
62% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/4G 0112 78.C2GCZ.AU30C 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.3% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.6
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 18.8
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-474G Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-474G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback