Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

22 months ago, 22 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 78.9 2-Core 145 63% 103 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 312 34% 270 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M 15,328 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 109C) 2GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3.16% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 5.8 Parallax 2 3% 3.87 fps	MRender 5.3 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 3.1 3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.16% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 177 148 144 148 148 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.9% Above average	Read 244 Write 224 Mixed 214 SusWrite 162 48% 211 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 27.9 89% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 186 139% 186 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 115%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB 14,066 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 326GB free Firmware: JEDOA60A SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 91 92 75 57 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 96.1 Write 94.1 Mixed 44 SusWrite 82.4 58% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5273EBO-CH9 830B M2S4G64CB8HD5N-CG 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.6% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.5 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 14.9 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	19x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	5x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	4x

RAM
M2S2G64CB88D5N-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 40%, 73 samples	4x
M2S4G64CB8HG5N-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 45%, 1,309 samples	3x
M2S4G64CB8HD5N-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 26%, 179 samples	3x

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $350