Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 05 '22 at 05:52
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$111
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 86.8
1-Core 174
2-Core 340
107% 200 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 963
95% 775 Pts
64-Core 1,220
76% 1,220 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$141
Asus(1043 8773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.9% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 57.8
Parallax 52.2
46% 55.6 fps
MRender 61.1
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 46.3
42% 52.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 1TB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB411D62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 240 215 223 214 211 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 727
Write 236
Mixed 426
SusWrite 220
89% 402 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 23.7
82% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 485
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 483
328% 405 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 330%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 DDR4 3200 2OZ DDR4 3200 DDR4 3200 2OZ 64GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 34
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 31.6
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 102%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 4,090 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $481
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback