Notebook P65_67RSRP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNotebook P65_67RSRP  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P65_67RSRP
Memory19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateAug 05 '22 at 20:47
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 120
50% 82.1 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 328
33% 270 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 6B02) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.4% Average
Lighting 51.5
Reflection 61
Parallax 53.5
42% 55.3 fps
MRender 60.3
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 55.9
46% 56.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ironside Titanium 512GB SSD
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KFS10010
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 390
Write 330
Mixed 264
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 26.2
87% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 193
167% 245 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 103%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
292GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 75 75 76 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 131
Write 98.5
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 76.3
71% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
211% 2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2133 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.4% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 21.8
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 14.1
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P65_67RSRP Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Notebook P65_67RSRP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback