Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1MW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1MW  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA PT10S
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131120
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 06 '22 at 12:38
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 76.8
1-Core 86
2-Core 129
60% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 227
31% 229 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA35) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 6.3
3% 4 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK66B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 82 84 79 83 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 470
Write 330
Mixed 376
SusWrite 121
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 70.8
4K Mixed 34.5
132% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 196
174% 257 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G1600L2S Hynix HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.3% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C55-A-1MW Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1MW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $39
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback