Clevo P170HMx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemClevo P170HMx  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO P170HMx
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '17 at 11:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 140
59% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 350
39% 309 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M
Clevo(1558 7100) 1.5GB
Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 265.77
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.31% Terrible
Lighting 8.47
Reflection 9.62
Parallax 6.62
7% 8.24 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 7.43
Splatting 11
8% 9.78 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.31%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM5 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 86.3
Write 82.5
Mixed 60.2
57% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.62
4K Mixed 0.19
53% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 62%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
98GB free
Firmware: JF4ZD0H0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 94.1
Write 96
Mixed 79.4
67% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.2
71% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown OCZ3M13334G 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P170HMx Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo P170HMx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $339
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback