Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20121017
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 06 '22 at 21:10
Run Duration	239 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 95.1 1-Core 40.9 2-Core 123 55% 86.2 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 408 38% 318 Pts	64-Core 377 23% 377 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6870 25,443 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Lighting 21.6 Reflection 21 Parallax 19.3 18% 20.6 fps	MRender 14.3 Gravity 16 Splatting 11.8 11% 14 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 753GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 836 854 850 838 858 892 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	138% Outstanding	Read 1118 Write 751 Mixed 934 SusWrite 855 205% 914 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 34.9 115% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 78.7 DQ Mixed 147 104% 135 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 138% Great: 372%
WD WD2002FFSX-68PF8N0 2TB 932 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 246GB free Firmware: 81.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 32 32 32 159 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 161 Write 26.6 Mixed 46.4 SusWrite 53 53% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 114%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$29 5,893 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 1TB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 150 150 152 149 151 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 154 Write 54.3 Mixed 104 SusWrite 150 86% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1 202% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 90%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 64GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 23GB free, PID de70 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 29 43 43 43 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 188 Write 40.3 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 40.2 66% 69 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 9.9 4K Mixed 8.9 682% 10.1 MB/s	DQ Read 17.7 DQ Write 14.3 DQ Mixed 11.7 950% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 69%
JetFlash TS4GJFV30 4GB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.7 2.7 3 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	4.88% Terrible	Read 18.2 Write 2.7 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 2.7 7% 6.98 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 26% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.88% Great: 6%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 64GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 39GB free, PID de70 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 17 17 14 27 27 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 161 Write 11.4 Mixed 49.2 SusWrite 19.1 59% 60.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 4.7 306% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	43% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 14 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 10.2 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 56.9 70% 56.9 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16