Asus X550JK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X550JK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550JK
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141008
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 23:12
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 76
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 176
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 253
33% 250 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 178D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 6.3
3% 8.73 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401120RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 413 437 433 425 436 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 414
Mixed 247
SusWrite 415
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 50.6
135% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 225
204% 312 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 103%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Kingston 9905417-083.A00G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X550JK Builds (Compare 565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550JK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback