Biostar H510MX/E 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar H510MX/E 2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 09:39
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11700-$190
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 69.9
1-Core 145
2-Core 273
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 829
80% 659 Pts
64-Core 1257
78% 1257 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 750
Biostar(1565 111A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3222
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
7.8% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 10
7% 10.7 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 11.8
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.8%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biostar S120-256GB 256GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 173 189 226 241 176 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 458
Write 51.5
Mixed 440
SusWrite 208
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 35.2
148% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 139
111% 154 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 115%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
223GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 84 86 87 78 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 85.8
Write 62.2
Mixed 52
SusWrite 84.6
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GTZB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.1% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.1
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 7.6
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510MX/E 2.0 Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar H510MX/E 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $112
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback