Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130920
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 10:42
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 0-$77
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
60.7% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 50
2-Core 104
50% 78.7 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 357
35% 286 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
HP(103C 6905) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.93
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 110
Parallax 128
103% 122 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 114
Splatting 102
105% 133 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 451
Write 431
Mixed 317
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 33.8
113% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 171
161% 251 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Seagate Enterprise Capacity 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 190 194 189 192 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 189
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 190
121% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 1.1
329% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 110%
Great: 128%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0740
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 29 28 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 31
Write 29.8
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 28.9
22% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.9
212% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 103%
USB DISK 3.0 127GB
112GB free, PID 6000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 23 26 27 28 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 28.4
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 26.6
37% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
87% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF51272AZ- 18KSF51272AZ- Hynix HMT125U6BFR8C Hynix HMT125U6BFR8C 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
65% Good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 23.8
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $474
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback