Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 10A90011GE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10A90011GE  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory21.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 15:27
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 191
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 381
51% 381 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 89 86 86 86 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 112
Write 116
Mixed 71.9
SusWrite 86.4
71% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$150
150GB free
Firmware: 3B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 38 37 37 39 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 43.2
Write 41.5
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 38.6
29% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 51%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$15
98GB free
Firmware: SS16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 70 68 67 71 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49% Average
Read 96.5
Write 101
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 74.1
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49%
Great: 60%
Innostor Innostor 64GB
51GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 14 14 14 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 69.5
Write 28.2
Mixed 49.4
SusWrite 15.4
49% 40.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA160B.C16 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 1311 M2F8G64CB8HB5N-CG Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 24GB
1600, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10A90011GE Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 10A90011GE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback