Today's hottest deals

Supermicro SYS-7048A-T

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro SYS-7048A-T  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10DAI
Memory60.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '22 at 17:42
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 170
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 595
55% 462 Pts
64-Core 1,582
98% 1,582 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 510
Nvidia(10DE 0967) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.23 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 4.2
4% 4.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A 1TB
858GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 412 384 414 414 414 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 396
Write 407
Mixed 307
SusWrite 407
86% 379 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 25.2
112% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 274
222% 315 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown(date:15/41) 9965589-007.D01G(date:17/19) 9965589-029.D01G Micron(date:15/11) 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2(date:17/18) 9965589-029.D01G(date:15/45) 9965589-008.D01G(date:15/46) 9965589-008.D01G 64GB
2133, 2400, 2133, 2400, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.2% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 20.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 18.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SYS-7048A-T Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Supermicro SYS-7048A-T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback