Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 13:54
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-1145G7E
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 213
71% 131 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 374
40% 320 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 20
Parallax 18.4
11% 17.5 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 25.8
Splatting 0.1
10% 13.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 455 351 271 293 296 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 464
Mixed 449
SusWrite 346
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 54.4
192% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 328
248% 335 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 116%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
InnoDisk Corporation M4S0-8GSSOCRG 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.7% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 10.5
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback