Today's hottest deals

Asus N750JV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus N750JV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N750JV
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 16:10
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 93
2-Core 172
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 473
47% 383 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 129D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 6.8
3% 6.33 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P190710b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 436 416 241 224 220 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 447
Mixed 425
SusWrite 330
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 42.7
152% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 127
126% 198 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
398GB free
Firmware: GH2OA450
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 122 120 123 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 122
Write 118
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 121
69% 96 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LS1KBG/4G Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.8% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N750JV Builds (Compare 188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N750JV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $370
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback