Lenovo 82B5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82B5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 22:56
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Memory 82.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 292
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1,029
96% 802 Pts
64-Core 1,511
94% 1,511 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3A3E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
45.2% Average
Lighting 56.1
Reflection 64.6
Parallax 54.5
46% 58.4 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 50.9
Splatting 50.2
44% 54.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 47%
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Legend(17AA 3A3E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.28.05
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 25.5
15% 35.9 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 18.2
15% 17.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GD9TNI-L2A0B 256GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11010C10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1171
Write 1,577
Mixed 1,250
299% 1,333 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 63.2
239% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 967
DQ Write 468
DQ Mixed 524
440% 653 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 212%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
559GB free
Firmware: JU0A2E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 105 105 88 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 128
Write 126
Mixed 56
SusWrite 102
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.6
242% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN F4-3200C22-8GRS 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 35.6
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 21.8
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82B5 Builds (Compare 1,511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 82B5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback