Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime21.3 Days
Run DateAug 15 '22 at 15:46
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 178
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 616
56% 472 Pts
64-Core 841
52% 841 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.25
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 41.5
Parallax 37.4
32% 39.5 fps
MRender 50.5
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 39.5
34% 42.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata DP900 256GB-DL3
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 124 127 148 106 146 MB/s
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.5% Good
Read 261
Write 248
Mixed 238
SusWrite 135
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 31.2
114% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 170
129% 173 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF51272PZ-2G3B1 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB RIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (82nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
102% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 35.3
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 20.6
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback