Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 86.2 1-Core 95.9 2-Core 190 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 354 44% 334 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 0585) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.46% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 1.4 1% 1.57 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.46% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 244 244 245 240 239 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	69.8% Good	Read 253 Write 239 Mixed 230 SusWrite 242 54% 241 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 35.8 115% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 198 149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1600C11-4GNT 04CD F3-1600C11-4GNS 8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 17.2 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 15.5 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1,060x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	300x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	263x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	161x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	153x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	77x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16