Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH315-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Covini_CFS
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190808
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateAug 16 '22 at 18:14
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 111
2-Core 231
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 530
57% 456 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1343) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.23% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 30
Parallax 7.3
4% 14.3 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 10.1
7% 7.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.23%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN720 SDA 256GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10121000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 350 360 342 353 358 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 782
Write 1,179
Mixed 879
SusWrite 366
181% 802 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 39.5
130% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 750
DQ Write 483
DQ Mixed 554
430% 596 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 122%
Great: 191%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
808GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 131 139 134 119 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 122
Write 120
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 129
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
196% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 12.9
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH315-52 Builds (Compare 4,099 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback