Microsoft Surface Pro X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Pro X  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Pro X
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2880 x 1920 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220107
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 21:37
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Microsoft SQ1
Qualcomm, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 58.3
1-Core 45.8
2-Core 92.9
40% 65.7 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 208
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM128GDGTNG-87A0A 128GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80041C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 160 160 158 157 159 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNCRMALPR-NEE 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2096 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74% Very good
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 27.5
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 25.2
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback