Today's hottest deals

MSI H110M PRO-VH (MS-7996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7996
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VH (MS-7996)  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '22 at 07:35
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 117
63% 99 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 243
24% 197 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
MSI(1462 7996) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.44% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 5.2
5% 5.27 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 6
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.44%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 274 275 261 365 328 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 422
Write 287
Mixed 285
SusWrite 291
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 18.7
83% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 346
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 209
180% 269 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 123%
SONY WALKMAN 16GB
2GB free, PID 06aa
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 14 15 14 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.5% Very poor
Read 20.2
Write 9.9
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 13.2
18% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.7
112% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SMD4-U4G26MB-24R 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M PRO-VH (MS-7996) Builds (Compare 1,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-VH (MS-7996) - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback