Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro16,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookPro16,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E1008331FDC96864
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3072 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220628
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 18 '22 at 14:54
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 72.1
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 143
57% 95.8 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 462
45% 368 Pts
64-Core 692
43% 692 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Apple(106B 0210) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.30.03.05
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.7% Poor
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 41
Parallax 47.6
29% 41.4 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 31.8
Splatting 25.7
22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 37%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP0512 500GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1270
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,008
Write 1,074
Mixed 777
213% 953 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 14.1
46% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 163
154% 235 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA2GS6CMR8K-VK 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
68.8% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 24.8
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro16,1 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Apple MacBookPro16,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback