Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190315
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 20 '22 at 00:50
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 63.9
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 211
67% 123 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 445
59% 443 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$141
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.93
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.3% Average
Lighting 55.4
Reflection 57.3
Parallax 52.1
45% 54.9 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 49.3
Splatting 46.4
43% 53.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 46%
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.2
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 21.8
12% 16.6 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 16
Splatting 12.6
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 145 76 6.1 105 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 468
Write 429
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 104
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 0.4
48% 12 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 92%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
600GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 118 118 121 128 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 113
Write 102
Mixed 98.8
SusWrite 120
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
87.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 30.6
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 22.9
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback