HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 21 '17 at 14:19
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$47
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 148
67% 108 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 222
30% 221 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 21
19% 20.6 fps
MRender 26.5
Gravity 23.7
Splatting 17.1
18% 22.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1114H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 487
Write 156
Mixed 235
64% 293 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 20
73% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 21.1
DQ Write 35.8
DQ Mixed 13.4
14% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
408GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 113
Write 116
Mixed 110
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.44
103% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 CT51264BD160B.C16F Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 1,145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback