Today's hottest deals

Biostar H310MHP 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics2.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H310MHP 2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210324
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '22 at 08:18
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 248
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 585
66% 518 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Device(7377 0000) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.78% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 3.6
3% 3.2 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.78%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R025Z
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 429 426 435 441 437 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Read 381
Write 398
Mixed 336
SusWrite 433
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 38.6
146% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 194
154% 207 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 60%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$67
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00B80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 194 196 198 199 198 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 161
Mixed 82
SusWrite 197
117% 161 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.9
246% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 115%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.8% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 14.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310MHP 2.0 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHP 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback