HP EliteBook 745 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 745 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 221C
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '17 at 19:12
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10 PRO-7350B R6, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 55.6
1-Core 57.2
2-Core 85.7
41% 66.2 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 124
17% 124 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
HP(103C 221C) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.11.5
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
4.54% Terrible
Lighting 5.23
Reflection 6.77
Parallax 6.66
4% 6.22 fps
MRender 6.14
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 7.52
5% 6.02 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.54%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 453
Write 358
Mixed 387
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 13.9
66% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 18.1
DQ Write 95.2
DQ Mixed 13.3
23% 42.2 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.3% Poor
MC Read 13
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 11.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.8
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 745 G2 Builds (Compare 112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 745 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback