Today's hottest deals

HP Pro 3000/3080

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Pro 3000/3080  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR 3664h
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '22 at 02:36
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Memory 45.1
1-Core 26
2-Core 48.7
26% 39.9 Pts
4-Core 42.2
8-Core 48.6
6% 45.4 Pts
64-Core 54.2
3% 54.2 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 315
HP(103C 102F) 1GB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 354.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.89% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 0.2
1% 1.27 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$55
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 64 58 68 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 53.3
Write 37
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 60.7
37% 49.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 59%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB
25GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 4.2 6.2 6.9 6.2 6.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
7.35% Terrible
Read 18.5
Write 0.8
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 5.8
7% 6.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
54% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.35%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905402-193.A00LF Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 3
10% 3.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3000/3080 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3000/3080

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback