MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '22 at 17:25
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 63.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 248
77% 144 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 798
78% 638 Pts
64-Core 1,255
78% 1,255 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.5% Poor
Lighting 34.5
Reflection 38.7
Parallax 37.1
28% 36.8 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 36
Splatting 26.2
26% 33.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101200RL Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,841
Write 1969
Mixed 1,664
408% 1,825 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 59.9
202% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 933
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 764
558% 739 MB/s
Poor: 172% Great: 292%
Apacer AS340 480GB
60GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 38 26 36 29 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 382
Write 20.7
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 36
24% 115 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 13.6
4K Mixed 0.4
56% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 1.5
DQ Mixed 30
30% 52.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.9% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 11.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 3,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback