Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 07:36
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 96.8
2-Core 195
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 378
51% 380 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.5
3% 4.23 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD0240S00 240GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0707B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 58 65 52 53 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
60% Good
Read 429
Write 337
Mixed 329
SusWrite 71.5
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 64.5
4K Mixed 22.1
94% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 36
81% 163 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 60%
Great: 85%
WD Green 500GB (2012)
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 137 137 138 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 136
Write 125
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 137
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback