Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160718
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 25 '22 at 23:17
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 74.5
2-Core 134
58% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 400
41% 331 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.3% Below average
Lighting 48.9
Reflection 46.1
Parallax 68.5
40% 54.5 fps
MRender 47.6
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 34.1
35% 44.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 79 65 57 79 34 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.5% Below average
Read 284
Write 265
Mixed 274
SusWrite 91.7
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 8.9
62% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 40.5
DQ Mixed 36.4
45% 84.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 140 149 152 152 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 68.9
Write 129
Mixed 63
SusWrite 148
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
198% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 96 97 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 72.8
Write 67.5
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 96.6
53% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC98
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 148 155 163 159 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 152
Write 17
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 152
64% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
95% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB
466GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 130 125 128 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 127
Write 115
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 128
144% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 51%
ST315005 41AS 1.5TB
537GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 71 71 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.4% Below average
Read 71.4
Write 69.7
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 69.9
88% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.07 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KB_8G_D3_1866_C10 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.2% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0 Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback