MSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 206%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 234%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics205% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive606% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D52
MotherboardMSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 03:10
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$241
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 176
2-Core 349
106% 202 Pts
4-Core 673
8-Core 1,251
115% 962 Pts
64-Core 2320
144% 2320 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
205% Outstanding
Lighting 294
Reflection 296
Parallax 321
240% 304 fps
MRender 358
Gravity 258
Splatting 193
212% 270 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 205%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
880GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4337 4362 4354 4340 4326 4307 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
606% Outstanding
Read 4252
Write 4,380
Mixed 3080
SusWrite 4,338
904% 4,012 MB/s
4K Read 79.3
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 97.4
355% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,603
DQ Write 1,205
DQ Mixed 1,359
1,028% 1,389 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 606%
Great: 623%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: S1111A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1378 1377 1381 1382 1381 1383 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,478
Write 1,368
Mixed 949
SusWrite 1,380
291% 1,294 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 192
4K Mixed 26.4
206% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 900
DQ Write 831
DQ Mixed 480
466% 737 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 241%
Great: 310%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 136 136 136 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 48.2
Write 79.6
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 136
59% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.9
214% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 64%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 131 133 134 134 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 114
Write 127
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 131
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 70%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 4.1 3.2 3.3 3.2 3.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.98% Terrible
Read 18.9
Write 11.3
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 4
14% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
25% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.98%
Great: 6%
VendorCo ProductCode 16GB
10GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 5.3 6.1 5.1 5.6 5.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
5.32% Terrible
Read 22
Write 5.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.1
10% 9.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
16% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.32%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.4% Outstanding
MC Read 43.4
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 28.8
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 25
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 28.5
66% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52) Builds (Compare 797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570S CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7D52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback