Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2124 385 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	85.1% Excellent	Memory 90.6 1-Core 122 2-Core 243 85% 152 Pts	4-Core 464 8-Core 439 61% 452 Pts	64-Core 450 28% 450 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 90%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Dell PERC H330 Adp 1TB 123 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 898GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.29 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 4.7 4.5 8 5.9 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 42.6 Write 20 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 8.3 16% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 59% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 108%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$8 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 9GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 3.7 3.3 7.8 5.4 15 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 98.2 Write 15.5 Mixed 21 SusWrite 7.3 34% 35.5 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.3 47% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SF4722G8CK8M8HLSBG 1x16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 15.7 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 16.9 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 47%

Yacht

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	4x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x

SSD
MTFDDAV240TCB 240GBCrucialBench 77%, 34 samples	3x
WDS240G1G0A- 240GBWDCBench 49%, 49 samples	2x
860 500GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,934 samples	2x

RAM
9965745-028.A00G 1x16GBUnknownBench 43%, 8 samples	3x
M391A1K43BB2-CTD 1x8GBUnknownBench 47%, 68 samples	2x
9965684-040.A00G 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 3 samples	2x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $195