Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80XV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80XV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 16:41
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 76.2
44% 67.6 Pts
4-Core 86.4
8-Core 82.7
11% 84.6 Pts
64-Core 83.7
5% 83.7 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 38E5) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.4% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 5.6
3% 4.8 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 6.5
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253LE120G 120GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 103 71 70 73 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 474
Write 372
Mixed 330
SusWrite 104
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 26.2
110% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 155
134% 200 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$34
0GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 108 111 110 102 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 106
Write 80.3
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 104
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.4% Poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 8.7
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 7.6
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80XV Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80XV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback