Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9420 APU (2016 M.SR) 14,746 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Memory 65.2 1-Core 61.4 2-Core 76.2 44% 67.6 Pts	4-Core 86.4 8-Core 82.7 11% 84.6 Pts	64-Core 83.7 5% 83.7 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 38E5) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	3.4% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 5.1 Parallax 5.6 3% 4.8 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 6.5 4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.4% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253LE120G 120GB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 103 71 70 73 71 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 474 Write 372 Mixed 330 SusWrite 104 71% 320 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 56.6 4K Mixed 26.2 110% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 249 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 155 134% 200 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 85%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 0GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 108 111 110 102 95 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 106 Write 80.3 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 104 64% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.4% Poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 8.7 20% 7.03 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 7.6 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	100x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	62x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 4,424 samples	32x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
CV3-DE256 256GBLiteonBench 74%, 1,719 samples	5x
MZ7LN128HAHQ-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 75%, 1,698 samples	5x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28