Monster TULPAR T5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
22 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemMonster TULPAR T5  (all builds)
MotherboardMonster TULPAR T5
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20141201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '22 at 21:02
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 96
2-Core 178
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 479
52% 411 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
MSI(1462 112D) 3GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.3% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 43.9
Parallax 38.8
31% 40.3 fps
MRender 40.7
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 35.3
32% 38.9 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 480GB
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 110 5 109 10 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 447
Write 200
Mixed 328
SusWrite 101
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 41.9
157% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 217
184% 268 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 98%
Mushkin MKNSSDAT120GB-DX 120GB
66GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 130 129 127 127 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 380
Write 152
Mixed 192
SusWrite 126
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 35.7
138% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 123
102% 147 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GKH800SO51208-1600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T5 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $44
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback