Monster TULPAR T7 V9.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V9.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V9.2
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '22 at 17:51
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 118
2-Core 222
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 462
54% 418 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7706) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 138
Parallax 143
105% 137 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 132
Splatting 117
99% 122 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
768GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1555 1955 2070 2214 2212 1988 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,099
Write 2,205
Mixed 2,040
SusWrite 1,999
471% 2,086 MB/s
4K Read 68
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 87.1
278% 91.5 MB/s
DQ Read 949
DQ Write 612
DQ Mixed 742
564% 768 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 328%
Great: 477%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2666C18-16GRS Kingston 9905630-063.A00G 04CD F4-2666C18-16GRS Kingston 9905630-063.A00G 64GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.4% Very good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 25.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 22.3
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V9.2 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V9.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback