MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7994
MotherboardMSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161216
Uptime10.4 Days
Run DateAug 28 '22 at 19:36
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 216
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 363
46% 347 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.3% Above average
Lighting 66.9
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 65.9
54% 68.2 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 65.4
54% 65.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 49 18 37 12 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.6% Below average
Read 176
Write 96.5
Mixed 102
SusWrite 30.9
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 15.1
62% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 80.8
DQ Write 45.1
DQ Mixed 9.2
21% 45 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 85%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
42GB free
Firmware: 0003HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 70 70 69 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 78.1
Write 77.8
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 69
51% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 58%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
40GB free
Firmware: CP100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 55 55 57 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 46.7
Write 54.3
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 55.8
36% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2133 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M GAMING (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 1,903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $264
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback