HP 500-039

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-039  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory16.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 30 '22 at 02:31
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 109
46% 77.2 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 169
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8570D
HP(103C 2AE0) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
4.14% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 4.8
4% 5.8 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 7
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.14%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB150G7 150GB
28GB free
Firmware: N2010112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 184 193 192 195 196 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 138
Write 192
Mixed 145
SusWrite 190
38% 166 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 25.5
96% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 166
123% 162 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
794GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 70 133 148 171 181 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 160
Write 147
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 130
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273CH0-YH9 Elpida EBJ40UG8EFW0-GN-F M391B5273CH0-YH9 20GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.4% Poor
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 8.9
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-039 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 500-039

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $467
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback