Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4120 2,420 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	36.2% Below average	Memory 38 1-Core 54.8 2-Core 104 37% 65.6 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 211 27% 204 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 1430) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.82% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 2 2% 1.63 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.82% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ128HBHQ-00000 128GB 306 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7000Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 110 93 109 105 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 575 Write 144 Mixed 177 SusWrite 105 54% 250 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 63.5 4K Mixed 24 84% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 166 131% 186 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 172%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 1x4GB 8,928 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	22.1% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 7.9 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 212 19% 212 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium Silver N5030IntelBench 35%, 2,697 samples	23x
Celeron N4120IntelBench 33%, 2,420 samples	14x
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	10x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	24x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	23x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ1 128GBKingstonBench 94%, 4,828 samples	15x
OM8PDP3256B-AA1 256GBKingstonBench 142%, 767 samples	10x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	8x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16