Lenovo 20M90024US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20M90024US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20M90024US
Memory39.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '22 at 19:21
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8850H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 86
1-Core 127
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 499
8-Core 724
76% 612 Pts
64-Core 715
44% 715 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.2% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 89.6
Parallax 111
100% 108 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 98.7
Splatting 88.8
86% 108 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 106%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 225F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1122
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.27% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 7.9
6% 7.83 fps
MRender 9.2
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 11
8% 8.97 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.27%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 850 626 636 637 629 531 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 2,088
Write 1,812
Mixed 1,290
SusWrite 651
326% 1,460 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 61
199% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 880
DQ Write 834
DQ Mixed 771
602% 828 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 223%
Great: 296%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
217GB free
Firmware: 5L2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,072
Write 1,758
Mixed 1,357
384% 1,729 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 62.2
195% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 961
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 844
644% 873 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 296%
Kbg40zmt128g TOSHIBA MEMORY 128GB
66GB free
Firmware: 0109AELA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 468 491 364 213 211 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 668
Write 473
Mixed 565
SusWrite 370
116% 519 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 50.9
171% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 805
DQ Write 490
DQ Mixed 497
411% 598 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 131%
Great: 172%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
669GB free
Firmware: LXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 148 153 151 153 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 115
Write 118
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 148
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 95%
asmedia ASM1153 1TB
718GB free, PID fdc0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 175
Write 174
Mixed 88.2
179% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
127% 1.63 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD Kingston KHX2666C15S4/8G Kingston KHX2666C15S4/8G M471A2K43CB1-CRC 48GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 26.1
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 24.5
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20M90024US Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 20M90024US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback