Lenovo 109737U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 109737U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '22 at 11:05
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 185
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 688
61% 519 Pts
64-Core 1,726
107% 1,726 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
EVGA(3842 5678) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 133
Parallax 119
99% 124 fps
MRender 93.2
Gravity 125
Splatting 111
90% 110 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500MS240G 240GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 56RR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 116 126 99 74 139 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.9% Above average
Read 250
Write 236
Mixed 207
SusWrite 130
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 27.2
92% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 147
121% 174 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 87%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
45GB free
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 388 377 374 380 334 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 466
Mixed 431
SusWrite 378
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 44.7
146% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 357
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 129%
HP 365GB MLC PCIe ioDrive2 for ProLiant Servers 365GB
278GB free
Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 557 558 559 558 557 556 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 596
Write 564
Mixed 492
SusWrite 558
124% 552 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 41.1
146% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 144
194% 347 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 123%
Great: 151%
Fusion-io ioScale 1.30TB
88GB free
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1000 971 982 985 963 971 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 85% Great: 94%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$110
5TB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 161 161 165 162 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 144
Write 148
Mixed 113
SusWrite 162
105% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7EFR4C 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54% Above average
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 18
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.5
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 109737U Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Lenovo 109737U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $299
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback