Gigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200702
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 02 '22 at 17:35
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 208
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 636
62% 511 Pts
64-Core 830
51% 830 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 22.8.2
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.9% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 121
Parallax 153
85% 126 fps
MRender 97.1
Gravity 118
Splatting 74.3
77% 96.3 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 548 900 987 1013 997 1016 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 2,362
Write 1,946
Mixed 176
SusWrite 910
298% 1,349 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 53.5
180% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 162
155% 242 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 219%
Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$133
334GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 405 447 447 446 451 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 477
Mixed 441
SusWrite 422
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 47.3
153% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 372
276% 366 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 107GB
35GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 425 426 409 408 413 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 473
Write 424
Mixed 415
SusWrite 416
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 30.6
101% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 321
241% 321 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 90%
Great: 90%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$97
18GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 75 126 118 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 116
Write 107
Mixed 90
SusWrite 92.6
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 27.9
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 26.7
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-50-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback