Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 156%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics186% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X399 Professional Gaming  (all builds)
Memory110.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191204
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 03 '22 at 14:42
Run Duration357 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2970WX
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 82.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 236
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 803
76% 631 Pts
64-Core 3,427
212% 3,427 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$500
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
186% Outstanding
Lighting 264
Reflection 257
Parallax 320
215% 280 fps
MRender 320
Gravity 238
Splatting 176
192% 244 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 186%
Great: 202%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Graphics
AMD(1002 0B0D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1243 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.6% Below average
Lighting 39
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 69.6
32% 48.8 fps
MRender 59.6
Gravity 47.7
Splatting 43
40% 50.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 45%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$139
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 622 269 268 262 261 260 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1875
Write 1,644
Mixed 609
SusWrite 324
246% 1,113 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 49.8
172% 60.9 MB/s
DQ Read 803
DQ Write 511
DQ Mixed 632
478% 649 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 177%
Great: 254%
Plextor PX-512M9PeGN 512GB
130GB free
Firmware: 1.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 658 512 525 523 480 550 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,704
Write 1,942
Mixed 1,409
SusWrite 542
314% 1,399 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 65.7
218% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 908
DQ Write 656
DQ Mixed 755
571% 773 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 204%
Great: 245%
Plextor PX-512M9PeGN 512GB
441GB free
Firmware: 1.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 779 487 522 522 520 522 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,774
Write 1,940
Mixed 1,378
SusWrite 559
317% 1,413 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 59.2
197% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 864
DQ Write 633
DQ Mixed 727
549% 741 MB/s
Poor: 117%
This bench: 200%
Great: 245%
Seagate ST6000NE0021-2EN11C 6TB
4TB free
Firmware: EN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 376 375 375 374 376 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 64% Great: 125%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
18GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 12 12 12 12 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
23% Poor
Read 90.5
Write 14.7
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 12.9
33% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.7
213% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 23%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
99% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 33.8
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 30.8
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,040
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback