Dell Studio 1747

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell Studio 1747  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0J509P
Memory3.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '22 at 02:35
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 720-$220
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30% Below average
Memory 49.7
1-Core 16.4
2-Core 32.7
24% 32.9 Pts
4-Core 58.7
8-Core 80.4
9% 69.6 Pts
64-Core 81.1
5% 81.1 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Dell(1028 02EB) 1GB
Driver: atidxx32 Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 2.7
3% 4.43 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 5.5
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
683GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 98 96 101 102 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 113
Write 112
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 101
69% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
29.5% Poor
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 12.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 5.5
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio 1747 Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio 1747

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback